• About
  • Our Work
  • Join
  • Partner
  • Media
EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

Sign-up for monthly updates on Winrock's work around the world.

WINROCK VOICES

Water Security and the Global Water Strategy

Water concerns and national security go hand-in-hand. Here's how.

Posted on December 13, 2017

By Eric Viala, Sustainable Water Partnership Director

On November 1, in what otherwise might have been a typical congressional hearing, Republican Congressman Charles Dent looked toward his former colleague, newly installed USAID Administrator Mark Green, and posed an interesting question: “Water scarcity is known as a threat multiplier… What more will USAID do under your leadership to get rid of water related security threats, be they conflict, disease, or famine due to water scarcity?”

Dent’s insightful observation that water scarcity is a threat multiplier is a prescient one, and it’s an area that Green is poised to deliver action on. His response touched on several possible solutions to water problems, from engaging with the private sector to integrating water concerns into USAID’s work in food security.

As this exchange indicates, water security is a cross-sectoral goal, aims to provide sufficient and reliable water not just to support public health, but also to bolster livelihoods, economic activities and political stability. This integrated understanding of water security has grown in recent years, culminating in the funding of water security programs like the Sustainable Water Partnership (SWP).

In 2012, the Global Water Security Paper produced by the Director of National Intelligence argued that over the next 10 years, water problems “will risk instability and state failure [and] increase regional tensions,” as well as “hinder the ability of key countries to produce food and generate energy, posing a risk to global food markets and hobbling economic growth.” In other words, water problems don’t end with water – they present myriad new challenges for seemingly separate sectors.

This understanding has also made its way into policy. In 2005, the U.S. acknowledged the importance of access to safe water by passing the Water for the Poor Act, thus making Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) – reliable access to safe drinking water and sanitation to improve public health – a U.S. foreign policy priority. Following this lead, the Water for the World Act of 2014 mandated the submission of a single government-wide Global Water Strategy to Congress by 2017.

So, on November 15 of this year, the first-ever U.S. government Global Water Strategy was posted to the attention of the public, stating, among other things, “Our vision is a water secure world, where people have sustainable supplies of water of sufficient quantity and quality to meet human, economic, and ecosystem needs while managing risks from floods and droughts.” The strategy not only supports WASH, but also recognizes other water-related needs: water for food, energy, socioeconomic growth and political stability.

There are several reasons to celebrate this landmark document. It acknowledges that the current water crisis not only increases poverty and disease, but also undermines economic growth, fosters food and energy insecurity, causes civil unrest, exacerbates migration pressures, aids terrorist recruitment, and can lead to state failure. Having acknowledged water security as a cross-sectoral theme, the strategy also presents water as an opportunity to advance core democratic values around equality, transparency, accountability, women’s empowerment and community organization. In other words, the strategy recognizes that water is a means of strengthening governance, civil society engagement, and resilience at all levels.

The strategy focuses on four objectives:

  1. Promote sustainable access to safe drinking water and sanitation services, and the adoption of key hygiene practices;
  2. Encourage the sound management and protection of water resources;
  3. Reduce conflict by promoting cooperation on shared waters; and
  4. Strengthen water sector governance, financing and institutions.

These objectives are water-sector specific, but acknowledging water security as a cross-sectoral development theme should translate to even more activities. For example, water should be utilized as a prime entry point for governance and stabilization programs. Furthermore, it is crucial to realize that improving water security directly contributes to socioeconomic empowerment for women, which in turn contribute to population control and overall socioeconomic stability. Water access is critical for developing and supporting livelihood activities for women, such as gardening and livestock farming. Therefore, food and energy security activities, and even more general economic growth efforts, should be required to incorporate water security as a fundamental component.

It will be intriguing to watch the implementation of this Global Water Strategy. What is certain is that the U.S. has an opportunity to lead the way in better managing this vital resource. Accordingly, federal agencies, resources and capacities should be mobilized with the understanding that water is essential to all aspects of life on Earth, and thus to all sectors of socioeconomic development.

SWP, USAID’s flagship water security program, is carrying out a first step in this process. With the help of our consortium of partners, we promote and implement sustainable water security improvement approaches in Cambodia, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan and Tanzania.

Water security is national security and, with proper planning and action can build resilience and self-reliance the world over. We look forward to working with leaders like Administrator Green and Congressman Dent to promote this American priority.

This post also appears on the Sustainable Water Partnership website.

ABOUT FARMER-TO-FARMER WINROCK VOLUNTEER ASSISTANCE

SUBSCRIBE TO POSTS

Loading

ARCHIVE

  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

CATEGORIES

  • AET
  • Africa
    • Ghana
    • Senegal
  • Asia
  • Bangladesh
  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
  • Ethiopia
  • Field Staff
  • Guinea
  • Kenya
  • Latin America
  • Mali
  • Myanmar
  • Nepal
  • Nigeria
  • Postharvest
  • Rural Livelihoods
  • Senegal
  • Spotlights
  • Volunteer Feedback
  • Volunteer of the Month
  • Winrock Staff
WinrockIntl
Tweets by @WinrockIntl
Follow @WinrockIntl

204 E 4th Street | North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114

ph +1 501 280 3000 | fx +1 501 280 3090

2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 | Arlington, Virginia 22202

ph +1 703 302 6500 | fx +1 703 302 6512

  • Contact
  • E-News Signup
  • Low Bandwidth
  • Code of Conduct
  • Winrock Privacy Statement
  • Site Map
  • Terms of Use
Copyright © 2015- Winrock International
DEV ENVIRONMENT